MegaCatálogo Bibliográfico
Centro de Documentación. FCEyS. UNMdP

- Recursos bibliográficos en papel y digitales -
- libros, artículos de revistas, ponencias de eventos, etc. -

» Resultado: 2 registros

Registro 1 de 2
Autor: Wolfersberger, J. - Amacher, G. S. - Delacote, P. - Dragicevic, A.
Título: The dynamics of deforestation and reforestation in a developing economy
Fuente: Environment and Development Economics. v.27, n.3. Beijer Institute of Ecological Economics; Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences
Páginas: pp. 272-293
Año: jun. 2022
Resumen: We develop a model of optimal land allocation in a developing economy that features three possible land uses: agriculture, primary and secondary forests. The distinction between those forest types reflects their different contributions in terms of public goods. In our model, reforestation is costly because it undermines land title security. Using the forest transition concept, we study long-term land-use change and explain important features of cumulative deforestation across countries. Our results shed light on the speed at which net deforestation ends, on the effect of tenure costs in this process, and on composition in steady state. We also present a policy analysis that emphasizes the critical role of institutional reforms addressing the costs of both deforestation and tenure in order to promote a transition. We find that focusing only on net forest losses can be misleading since late transitions may yield, upon given conditions, a higher level of environmental benefits.
Palabras clave: DEFORESTACION | BOSQUES | BOSQUES PRIMARIOS | BOSQUES SECUNDARIOS | DESARROLLO ECONOMICO |
Solicitar por: HEMEROTECA E + datos de Fuente
Registro 2 de 2
Autor: Delacote, P. - 
Título: Agricultural expansion, forest products as safety nets, and deforestation
Fuente: Environment and Development Economics. v.12, n.2. Beijer Institute of Ecological Economics; Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences
Páginas: pp. 235-249
Año: 2007
Resumen: This paper aims to address the impact on deforestation of the use of forest products as safety nets by poor agricultural households. Two safety-net uses may be implemented: the diversification strategy and the coping strategy. With both strategies, crop risk reduction, lower risk aversion and larger population increase tropical deforestation. Forest profitability always tends to increase the forest cover in the diversification case. Conversely, considering the coping strategy, two opposite effects determine the impact of forest profitability on the forest cover: a portfolio effect and an insurance effect. Finally, the household is better off and deforests less when using the diversification strategy instead of the coping strategy.
Solicitar por: HEMEROTECA E + datos de Fuente

*** No hay más registros para visualizar ***

>> Nueva búsqueda <<

Inicio